Category Archives: In the Press

Thank You, Joseph Shenker and Sullivan & Cromwell

Leave a reply

There are many reasons why Sullivan & Cromwell is arguably the world’s most prestigious law firm, but perhaps first and foremost is the fact that they always seem to lead the market in doing the right thing when it comes to their clients, vendors and employees.   The firm hires the most talented and ethical people to service their clients, pays over-the-market rates to their valued vendors, makes doing business with them a pleasure, and compensates their own people at the very top of the market as well. 

A recent instance of Sullivan & Cromwell leadership-by-example is the firm’s public stance against hiring individuals who have engaged in the activity indicative of support for the terrorist group Hamas that has infested America’s universities since Ocober 7, 2023, the day that Hamas and Palestinians under their control engaged in a murder, rape, torture and kidnapping spree in Israel that resulted in the death of over 1200 civilians, the torture and maiming of hundreds of others and the taking of over 250 hostages.  As reported in Bloomberg Law, Sullivan & Cromwell’s senior chair Joseph Shenker stated that the firm “ha[s] been following closely the events at the schools from which we recruit, and [we] have been in touch with the placement offices, deans, and trustees, as well as many concerned students.  Creating, or participating in, a climate of harassment, intimidation and discrimination is unacceptable. We have been very open about our firm’s views on these matters … We have been, and will be, extremely vigilant in our hiring activities to ensure we are only hiring those students we are comfortable will proudly represent the values and principles of our firm.”   https://news.bloomberglaw.com/business-and-practice/sullivan-cromwell-plans-vigilant-hiring-checks-after-protests

It is beyond question that Hamas is a death cult committed to the genocide of Jews.  As Chaim Steinmetz, the senior Rabbi of New York’s largest orthodox Jewish congregation, brilliantly summarized on Instagram earlier this week in the aftermath of the Israeli Defense Force’s rescue of a Moslem Arab-Israeli citizen from the dungeons of Hamas after 326 days in captivity: 

“Yesterday’s hostage rescue can teach you everything you need to know about the Hamas-Israel conflict.  Let’s see what Hamas is all about and what Israel is all about.   Let’s look at what the Hamas charter says:  ‘The day of judgment will not come about until Muslims fight the Jews killing the Jews.’  That’s what Hamas believes in, killing Jews. Not Zionists, not Israelis, but Jews.  Let’s look at the Hamas leader Yahya Sinwar.  He’s known as the butcher of Khan Yunis because he’s killed so many of his own Palestinians.  Hamas has a Stasi like secret police force that observes every person in Gaza.   Let’s look at Hamas’ objectives.  Sinwar wants more civilian casualties.  He’s written in private communications:  ‘No blood, no news’ and all he wants is the attention of the world.  Now let’s look at Israel.   Israel’s Declaration of Independence says that it will ensure complete equality of social and political rights to all its inhabitants irrespective of religion race or sex.  Israel believes in the rights of minorities.  Arabs serve on Israel’s Supreme Court, in Israel’s Knesset and in the Officer Corps of the IDF.  When you visit Israel, you’ll see Arab citizens in the hotels of Tel Aviv and the shopping malls of Jerusalem, and any serious observer could see this contrast in the rescue of the hostage Farhan Al-Qadi.  Al-Qadi is an Israeli citizen who is a Muslim Arab.  He actually was a security guard in one of the Kibbutzim before he was kidnapped by Hamas.  Israel sent the IDF in to save his life.  The contrast between Israel and Hamas is a contrast between caring for your citizens or using them as cannon fodder.  It is a contrast between life and death, and as the Torah reading tells us this week, we need to choose the path of life.  Hamas has chosen the path of death.” https://www.instagram.com/reel/C_NixQrxHSi/?igsh=MWlyZjJ4cjZwb2duZQ==

So why would anyone in their right mind, let alone a preeminent law firm, want to hire or otherwise affiliate with any individual who supports Hamas in any way?   As Judge Matthew Solomson of the US Court of Federal Claims stated shortly after the October 7 massacre:  “To me, it’s a simple proposition that just like no judge would hire anyone who endorsed the KKK or the Nazis, anyone who endorses or approves or otherwise gives comfort to — in writing — Hamas, should not be hired.” See https://news.bloomberglaw.com/us-law-week/us-judge-wont-hire-law-clerks-who-signed-anti-israel-letters

Nobody is questioning the right of students or other individuals who are privileged to live in the United States of America to publicly express their evil inclinations, idiocy or ignorance by demonstrating in support of Hamas.  But no law firm should hire these people.  So thank you, Mr. Shenker for stating the obvious:  “[W]e are asking people to pay [our attorneys] a lot of money for their critical thinking skills. If their critical thinking skills land them in that place [blaming the victims of the terror for the terror], then they have no place here.” See Elite Biglaw Firm Adopts Tougher Background Checks For New Hires Amid Campus Protests – Above the Law

CORONA, PUTIN AND BIG LAW’S LATERAL HIRING RODEO

Leave a reply

These last two years may have been the wildest ever in the history of BigLaw lateral hiring.  Before recruiting at major law firms came to a virtual standstill In March 2020 when much of America shut down in the hope of curbing the COVID epidemic, we had been enjoying boom market conditions for about a decade since the end of the sub-prime crisis of 2008 and the resulting Great Recession.  But we were ready to hit the brakes fast and so we did.  An interesting indicator of the extent to which COVID-related fears impacted hiring is simply noting the number of job postings that were eliminated from law firm websites in March 2020 in comparison to the previous four-year average for March;  while from 2016 to 2019, on average only 730 attorney job listings were eliminated from firm websites, almost three times that number (1857) were erased in March 2020.  See Lateral Hirings Plummet Amid COVID-19 Fears.  See also Lateral Hiring Fell in 2020 – You Can Probably Guess Why – The Texas Lawbook. 

It is no overstatement to recall that many felt the end of the world was upon us, and law firm hiring managers were no exception;  the vast and brutal devastation caused by the new deadly virus was all around us and the utter helplessness we felt in defending against it was paralyzing for all but the most steadfast law-firm hiring managers as corporate clients tightened belts, keeping more and more legal work in-house and in many cases delaying payment on law firm bills for services already rendered.  But hiring freezes was just step one; most major firms reacted quickly to shed every ounce of fat possible from their overhead, many cutting into lean meat as well in order to enhance chances of survival with attorney and staff pay cuts, layoffs and reduction of real estate commitments being the primary means of preparing for the worst.  See BigLaw Associate Layoffs in 2020 Were ‘Reminiscent Of 2009 And the Great Recession, see also Wake Up Call: Goodwin Unloads Associates Via ‘Stealth Layoffs’: Report (noting that some 69 law firms had announced pay cuts for associates and non-equity partners by May 2020 in reaction to the COVID pandemic), and see Skadden is latest firm to announce layoffs; experts say more law firms will follow, and see More Associate Salaries on the BigLaw COVID-19 Chopping Bloc.

But lo and behold, as 2020 progressed and business leaders proved deal hungry resulting in increased demand for legal services, law firms found themselves not only leanly staffed but busier than ever, enjoying record revenues and profits and compelling law firm hiring managers to shift gears from pedal-to-the-metal reverse to first gear forward.  See Law Firm Revenue Shoots Up in Booming First Nine Months of 2021.  And see Big Law Firms Prosper Despite Covid-Impaired Economy.

This dramatic shift resulted in a hiring frenzy for service attorneys accompanied with the adoption of record base-salaries and bonuses in order to effectively compete for talent.  Davis Polk was the first firm to swing its wad, offering pandemic bonuses to service attorneys ranging from $7,500 to $40,000 as a function of seniority, many other elite firms quickly following suit.  See Top 20 BigLaw Firm Matches Salaries That Go Up To $415K.  See also Salary Wars Scorecard: Firms That Have Announced Raises (2022).   And see A Quarter of U.S. Firms Raised Wages, Gave Bonuses in Covid Era.   At the same time, service attorneys who had become accustomed to working remotely during the pandemic expressed their sense of heightened power vis-a-vis their law firm employers by rejecting calls to return to the office at least three days per week when the pandemic began to feel more under control:  See Wake Up Call: Lawyers Reject Three Days in Office, Survey Finds. 

That said, the euphoria among service attorneys and managers alike appeared extreme and it felt to market observers that many of them seemed to forget that such good times always eventually end (see, for example The legal talent war that broke out in 2021 shows no sign of slowing down) despite warnings that restraint was in order.  See, for example ‘The pay rates for lawyers are unsustainable.  See also Big Law’s Soaring Profits May Be Next Pandemic Darling to Falter.  And see Law Firms Reverse Coronavirus Cuts, but ‘Triage’ Not Over Yet.  

Then, just short of two years from the date the music stopped in March 2020, Russia invaded Ukraine and, when the invasion was met with more resistance than Putin anticipated, the unthinkable happened: he threatened the use of nuclear weapons if he alone deemed that measure necessary.  While BigLaw pulled out of Russia in an expression of outrage, see, for example, Dentons, DLA Piper End Ties With Russia as War’s Toll Mounts, the thought that one irrational actor could unleash a nuclear arsenal on the West helped send deal activity and equity markets tanking, along with them all those vast paper profits, Paul Weiss reporting that in March 2022 U.S. deal count and total deal value decreased 29% and 34%, respectively among other similarly sobering statistics.  See PowerPoint Presentation (paulweiss.com).

It’s still too early to tell for sure, but this legal recruiter anticipates another quick switch of the gears to reverse on the part of law firm hiring managers, law firms once again anticipating struggles to make good on compensation guarantees and other financial commitments entered into during the euphoria of COVID-era record revenue and profits and corresponding demand for legal services.  At Hanover Legal, we constantly urge restraint, caution and due diligence in exploring options, reminding our clients that since the dot-com bubble burst of 2000, on average one AmLaw 100 firm has collapsed every year and a half, the most recent being LeClaire Ryan after a string including once venerable giants Brobeck, Heller Ehrman, Wolf Block, Thelen, McKee Nelson, Thacher Proffitt, Bingham McCutcheon, Dewey & LeBoeuf and Chadbourne.  See, for example Law firms had another big quarter, but associate pay is taking a toll.  Unfortunately, we believe that the question is not if but when a major law firm or two will be bucked off this raging bull.  We also anticipate an increase in law firm merger activity as a hedge to ensure survival.  Come what may, Hanover Legal remains on board to assist our law firm and attorney clients in any way.

BigLaw’s Heartbreak Hill

Leave a reply

Anyone following the market of BigLaw is aware that over the course of the past two decades, AmLaw 100 firms have collapsed or been acquired at the rate of one every year-and-a-half or so, remembering with either nostalgia or disdain once venerable names like Brobeck, Coudert Brothers, Heller Ehrman, Thelen, Brown Raysman, Thacher Profitt, McKee Nelson, Dreier, Howrey, Dewey & LeBoeuf, Wolf Block, Bingham McCutcheon, and Chadbourne.  The demise of most of these firms can be attributed primarily to one fatal flaw which manifested during the various crises we’ve collectively experienced since the onset of this millennium: irrational exuberance and the dot-com bubble, greed and the sub-prime bubble or lack of practice area-diversity and the great recession. Others took stock during periods of relatively stability, arriving at sanguine decisions to salvage what remained viable and attach to a stronger ship or simply dissolve. Either way, the market of BigLaw is contracting quickly and in constant flux, the current pandemic offering no respite.

At the onset of Covid-19, BigLaw by and large halted lateral partner hiring. But as the pandemic continued on with no end in sight, while weaker and more risk-averse firms stagnated on the lateral partner acquisition front many simultaneously suffering increased rates of lateral partner departures, stronger and less risk-averse firms solidified their respective bases acquiring aggressively on the lateral partner market thus increasing revenue and profitability gaps and rendering weaker and less aggressive firms more vulnerable and further diminishing their ability to effectively compete.

Specifically, over the course of this pandemic during which lateral partner activity has dropped approximately thirty percent from pre-pandemic rates (see https://www.law.com/dailybusinessreview/2020/10/08/dragged-down-by-finance-and-energy-the-lateral-market-has-cratered/), firms that have pushed hard and achieved net gains on the lateral partner acquisition front thus widening the gap between them and their competitors include King & Spalding, McDermott, DLA, Greenberg Traurig and Cozen O’Connor (see https://www.law.com/americanlawyer/2020/10/12/opportunity-in-crisis-these-firms-seized-on-an-unusual-lateral-hiring-market-in-2020/, citing data accumulated by legal consultancy firm Decipher)). In contrast, from January through August 2020, Boies, Schiller & Flexner hemorrhaged 50 of its 142 partners or over one-third of its partnership while only adding two lateral partners during the same period. (See https://www.abajournal.com/news/article/these-larger-law-firms-had-the-most-partner-exits-one-firm-says-pandemic-changed-career-plans/).

Over the next few months we can expect to see more firms coming out of lateral partner hibernation and anticipate hiring approaching pre-pandemic rates, with continuing strong lateral activity in bankruptcy and data privacy and increasing movement in labor and employment, white collar and other regulatory specialties. That said, as our fiercely competitive market works its way through these current challenging times, the pack of leading firms will continue to dwindle in number and distance itself from weaker or more risk-averse firms, some of which will inevitably be acquired or dissolve as BigLaw further contracts.

Thankfully and much more importantly though, now with an effective Covid-19 vaccine apparently only months away, we may finally be approaching the top of this particularly excruciating Heartbreak Hill. In the meantime, we at Hanover Legal remain on call and available to assist law firm managers and partners with whom we are privileged to work towards the achievement of their goals with respect to the market, as we have during the previous challenging periods we have experienced together since our founding in 2000.

Stay safe and healthy and Happy Holidays!